The Arizona Sentinel

July 5, 2009

Obama Indictments have been served

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 3:36 pm
Obama Indictments have been served by a American Grand Jury.   Now America you need to make sure that those that have taken a oath on the Bible, to defend The United States of America, against all enemies foreign and domestic.  Do their job. !!!!!
Updates taken from AmericanGrandJury.org.
 
Are you made as hell yet? Are you going to continue to take it?
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA listen and act!!!!!
 

UPDATES ON TRIP TO WASHINGTON (Monday June 29th):
text via phone from Chalice: posted in central time by my phone.

Carl Swensson and Mack Ellis served the 11-page Presentments to President Barack Obama, at the White House for FRAUD and TREASON.

11:49am Chalice has video. (woooo hoooo documents being accepted)
11:57am Presentments in the hands of Secret Service
12:06pm 2 Secret Service, names John and Jessica, received presentments

They were denied entrance to the Dept of Justice (Eric Holder)

1:06 FBI has been served and they are on the way to District Court

3:05 pm They at US District Court. They were served.

3:29 We served Dept of Justice. They will get back to us. We have a judge who will review it.

3:32 We are on the House serving 4 Congressmen.

5:44pm Presentments delivered to Senate Minority Leader McConnell, TX Senators Hutchinson and Cornyn, Ron Paul, and Michelle Bachmann

They are on way back to hotel and will start again tomorrow. If I hear more details later about today, then I will post them here.

REPRINT FROM CARL’S WEBSITE:

1. Secret Service for the White House – SERVED

2. USDOJ – United States Dept of Justice – guards sent us instead to the FBI

3. FBI – SERVED PRESENTMENTS

4. District Court – U.S. Marshalls – We got new coverletters notarized and then the Clerks of the District Court TOOK PRESENTMENTS – a huge American THANK YOU NEEDS TO BE SENT TO JOE BURGESS ESPECIALLY and PRAY HARD FOR FAVOR WITH CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT, ROYCE LAMBERTH, WHO WILL GIVE MAIN DECISION WHEN HE SEES THESE PAPERS DELIVERED TO HIM

5. SCOTUS – Supreme Court of the United States – ALL papers must go through the guard house on the backside of the Supreme Court. Officer TOOK PRESENTMENTS, FIXED A LABEL IN OUR RECEIPT AREA WHICH HE EXPLAINED TO ME WAS THEIR SIGNATURE; HAD SUPREME COURT AND DATE AND TIME STAMPED: SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES SERVED PRESENTMENTS!

6. PENTAGON – CARL AND MACK – OUR BRAVE MEN SERVED PRESENTMENTS!!! (THEY WERE SURROUNDED AND SEARCHED, AND EVEN THEIR TRUCK WAS SEARCHED!)

7. On Monday, June 29, 2009, Carl and Mack delivered SuperAmericanGrandJury Presentments to Senator Ron Paul and Representative Michele Bachman!!! Penny and press covered presentments to Senators John Cornyn and Kay Bailey Hutchison, both of Texas, and Representative Randy Neugebauer of Texas, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell!

8. From suggestions from callers the next day Tuesday, June 30, 2009, while the Carl and Mack were having FUN at the Pentagon, Press and Penny SERVED PRESENTMENTS TO:

Senator John McCain 10:10 a.m.
Senator Tom Coburn 10:15 a.m.
Senator Lamar Alexander 10:30 a.m.
Representative Louie Gohmert 11:40 a.m.
(after SCOTUS at 11:25 a.m.!)
Patrick McHenry at 11:50 a.m.
Kenny Marchant at 12:05 p.m.
Michael C. Burgess, MD at 12:20 p.m.
Marsha Blackburn at 12:35 p.m.
Nancy Pelosi at 12:55 p.m.

Advertisements

3 Comments »

  1. These ‘presentments’ have been delivered. What is the next step? When will a judge see these papers and act on them, if you know. Getting impatient as no news about anything! Thanks, Scott

    Like

    Comment by Scott Walker — July 8, 2009 @ 2:16 am

  2. […] Indictments have been served 0 # Leave a […]

    Like

    Pingback by This regarding Obama,s Grand Jury Indictments « The Arizona Sentinel — July 6, 2009 @ 2:53 pm

  3. Note that Royce Lamberth is not the chief magistrate judge. Magistrate judges rank under district judges. Judge Lamberth is the chief U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Columbia; he’s more powerful than a magistrate judge. See http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/lamberth-bio.html for his biography.

    It’s important to get this information into his possession, but I don’t think he has any legal power to act on it of his own motion. Don’t forget about quo warranto in the D.C. Code. § 16-3501 of the D.C. Code says: “A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.”

    Judge Lamberth is the chief judge in the very court mentioned by the D.C. Code as the one to preside over the quo warranto. § 16-3502 of the code goes on: “The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person. The writ may not be issued on the relation of a third person except by leave of the court, to be applied for by the relator, by a petition duly verified setting forth the grounds of the application, or until the relator files a bond with sufficient surety, to be approved by the clerk of the court, in such penalty as the court prescribes, conditioned on the payment by him of all costs incurred in the prosecution of the writ if costs are not recovered from and paid by the defendant.”

    Of course, the Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C. have failed to bring quo warranto. § 16-3503 of the code says: “If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs.”

    So if there is someone out there who requested of either the Attorney General or U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C. that a quo warranto be brought on THEIR (the person’s) behalf, and they didn’t do so (and of course, we know they didn’t), that person can now ask the court (over which Judge Lamberth presides) to institute quo warranto under § 16-3503 of the code. Though it would be wise to have an attorney handle the specifics; I’m thinking Leo Donofrio would be best.

    So the question is, is there such a person out there who has documentation to prove that they made such a request to either the Attorney General or U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C.? And if not, perhaps someone should make that request now, and if the two relevant authorities refuse to act then the matter can be moved to a § 16-3503 request as aforementioned.

    Like

    Comment by Nick — July 6, 2009 @ 12:12 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Your Thoughts Welcome

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Recent Items

A book blog by an author of AI-Assisted fiction

A Lawman Speaks for Liberty

Border and National Security, Private Property rights, Removing Federal agencies from the states,American Energy Policy, Constitutional Conservative

%d bloggers like this: